FIRST ARRIVING NETWORK
First Arriving Network
Powered by the First Arriving Network, Reaching 1M+ First Responders Worldwide

Yes, I am afraid of T2′s.

Follow @chiefb2

While driving home from work tonight I had a phone interview (hands free of course) with a fellow National Fire Academy classmate who is trying to finish up his last research paper so he can receive his Executive Fire Officer designation.  His topic of choice is how best to integrate social media into the fire service.  Fascinating conversation, and it was great to catch up by actually talking instead of interacting via text.  He wanted my opinion on benefits, uses and pitfalls of emergency services SM.  I hope he was able to keep up with my spouting stream of consciousness.  After about 20 minutes he was able to get a word in, and asked me the most important question of all: What are the main obstacles that fire departments face in integrating social media?  The question made me pause, which was good because I had sucked out all of the air from my rig.

Given the relatively newness of SM, there are tons of perceived obstacles….hmmm….. But, from a fire service perspective, what is holding us back?  I gave him four:

1.  Culture - Anyone related to the fire service knows the slogan “100 years of tradition, unimpeded by progress”.  But, that is not what I’m talking about when it comes to SM.  I think it is more complicated than that.  True, we honor tradition, and change often comes slowly.  But, SM is different.  The pervasiveness of SM is embraced by the fire service whether we know it or not.  As firefighters, we crave and seek out instant information to help us do our jobs.  We expect – no demand – information ASAP to help us make a problem go away.  Yet, don’t expect us to take the time to provide instant information about how we are doing our jobs.  We don’t have time for that.  Just give us the information we need and get out of our way.  Our new firefighters are coming in the door having been weened on MySpace and now proficient with Facebook.  BUT, most have little to no exposure to real time SM short messaging beyond SMS on their smartphones.  The SMSP (Short Message Social Platform…I think I just made that up) is foreign to most of them.  That is a problem that should go away in a few short years.

2. Bureaucracy – ’nuff said…..wait, add records retention laws and/or liability concerns to the mix.

3.  Security - I’ve heard emergency management professionals speaking at conferences urging extreme caution (read this “avoid like the plague”) in using social media for emergency communications.  Hijacked accounts, spoofed accounts, bad guy intelligence gathering, etc…. are given as reasons why we should avoid using SM for emergencies.  REALLY? If a tractor-trailer rig full of methyl-ethyl bad stuff rolls over on my freeway in the middle of my city and starts oozing gobs of goo, I shouldn’t use SM because it may have been a 16 y.o. T2 (Texting Terrorist) who cut the truck driver off?

4.  ICS (refer to #2) – Please refer to my previous posts on my blog or my guest posts on Emergency Management Magazines blog site  http://www.emergencymgmt.com  to gain further perspective here.  I’m an ICS disciple, and always will be.  In battle – military or emergency services- ICS discipline is critical.  With that said, situational awareness, teamwork, improvisation and innovation (with a dab of heroism) help carry the day.  ICS is bureaucracy in it’s purest form.   Integrating effective SM messaging  requires bending – wait…breaking the rules.  It’s not rocket science.  Give the PIO the game plan, expand their boundaries for releasing info without vetting and get out of their way.   BUT, still keep them on a leash….I like those retractable ones…. just when the hounds think they’re free, you yank ‘em back!

I know this is pretty simplistic.  But, I really am a pretty simple guy.

SHARE THIS
Looking for a Great Selection of Quality Used Fire Engines, Aerials & Rescues?
Click Here for Command Fire Apparatus

Comments - Add Yours

  • http://EPI2oh.com Tom Malley

    Lack of resources and lack of time are the other two impediments.

  • Marcus Deyerin

    I’d like to concur with your counter-argument regarding the security issue. While of course security is and should be a concern in the context of SM use by emergency management / responder agencies, there are two reasons I think this concern is overblown. First, any information / communications platform is prone to being hacked. There’s nothing inherently unique in this regard about SM other than its relative newness. Second, some hack for financial incentives, others for notoriety; but the population of those with both the skills and inclination to hack or spoof an emergency responder related account with the genuine intent of creating havoc or harm is so marginal… the benefit of SM4EM simply outweighs the risk. Third, one of the things we’re witnessing regarding SM is how quickly “truth outs” – SM is surprisingly self-correcting at speeds unheard of via traditional communications platforms. Granted, this is not to suggest that a well-organized bad-guy operation couldn’t cause a good deal of damage in the SM realm before it was identified and squashed, but the level of organization and funding that kind of effort would require strains incredulity when considering this as a serious threat for anything below a national level incident.

    Will an emergency management / responder agency suffer a SM security breach at some point – probably. But that’s not a reason to avoid SM altogether. Back when usb tummbdrives first appeared on the scene there was a [surprisingly long] period of time when they were not allowed inside the CIA’s headquarters building. Their small physical size but massive storage capacity makes them a very handy tool for conveniently storing and transporting around information. This obviously gave the security types an aneurysm, and their knee-jerk reaction was to simply make them verboten. But since the thumbdrive eventually became a ubiquitous piece of technology, the strategy of “avoidance” became less and less sustainable. They eventually came up with a solution – but not without much handwringing about how to keep the genie in the bottle. In fact, it was only within the last year that the Dept. of Defense essentially gave up on its imposed ban of the devices, finally recognizing that’s simply not a realistic proposition.

    The point is that there is always going to be evolutionary and somethings revolutionary (sometimes called “disruptive”) technologies to emerge that no matter how you try, you simply can’t draw a circle around them and say “well we’ll just avoid the risk of using it by not using it at all.” Otherwise, we’d have a very dull history of progress indeed.

  • http://allhazards.blogspot.com David Wild

    Great post, interesting re ICS – got me thinking SM could provide valuable information going into ICS – situational awareness, etc – even if it’s not part of ICS

  • Pingback: Obstacles to Social Media in the Fire Service | No Ambition But One

About chiefb2

Retired fire chief,Type 3 AHIMT IC, PIO. Current industrial services safety professional, social media emergency management disciple (no, I'm not a "guru"). Crisis communications consultant. Dad with an open wallet.